Decision details

Item 14: (AMENDED PLANS) Development of a single dwelling on the land adjacent to number 6 Valley Close

6 Valley Close, Colden Common, SO21 1UN

Case number: 18/01809/FUL

During public participation, Mary Shields, David Harwood and Rob Veck  spoke in objection to the application and answered Members’ questions thereon.

At the conclusion of debate, the Committee agreed to refuse permission for the following reasons: contrary to Policy DM16, does not respond positively in terms of its design, scale and layout.

RESOLVED:

1.             That the decisions taken on the Development Control Applications in relation to those applications outside the area of the South Downs National Park be agreed as set out in the decision relating to each item, subject to the following:

                        (i)         That in respect of item 6, permission be granted for the                       reasons and subject to the informatives set out in the Report                            and the revised conditions set out in the Update Sheet, subject               to: the verbal update to amend the wording of revised Condition                   9 to read ‘BREEAM excellent’; an amendment to revised                                Condition 34 to change the hours of use to read 0500            to 2300                       hours; and an additional condition requesting details of the                           Travel Plan to be submitted to officers, with the precise wording                         of this condition to be delegated to the Head of Development                        Management, in consultation with the Chairman 

                        (ii)        That in respect of item 11, permission be granted for the                     following reason: The DPD has not yet been adopted and this               site is not now available (as was proposed in the DPD).

(iii)       That in respect of item 12, permission be granted

                        for the reasons and subject to the conditions and informatives                      set out in the Report, subject to an amendment to Condition 3 to                  ensure that boundary hedging must not exceed 1.2 metres in                       height.

(iv)       That in respect of item 13, permission be granted for the

                        following reasons: the proposal accords with Policy DM11.                            Conditions would be included to protect trees and ecology, to                    require details of materials and  drainage and to restrict                                    occupation to an agricultural worker, with precise wording to be                   delegated to the Head of Development Management, in                                 consultation with the Chairman; and

                        (v)        `That in respect of Item 14, permission be refused for the                   following reasons: contrary to Policy DM16, does not                                            respond positively in terms of its design, scale and layout.