9 53 Cheriton Road Winchester SO22 5AX (Case Reference:23/01165/TPO) PDF 277 KB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Proposal Description: Mature Holm Oak in rear garden
approximately 15m from rear of house. The application was for
permission to fell the tree on the grounds of the potential risk to
people and property, excessive shading in the owners and
neighbouring gardens because of the tree's dense canopy and
year-round leaf cover, high maintenance burden, drying-out of the
ground by the root system and the tree's low ecological
value.
The
application was introduced and during public participation, Stuart
Dorward spoke in support of the application and answered members'
questions.
Councillor Chris Westwood spoke as a ward member in support of
the application and expressed several points on behalf of residents
which could be summarised as follows:
- That, the first issue to discuss was the amenity
value of the tree, which was significant. The tree had been
protected by a TPO since 1992.
- That, 31 years later, the tree had grown too large
for its current setting, and the amenity value recognised in 1992
had been lost. That, the officer's report states that the tree had
good public visual amenity value, but the wider amenity value may
not be as great as portrayed.
- That, the tree was having an impact on the owner's
mental health. The tree's size and maintenance were stressful for
the homeowners, impacting their well-being.
- That, there were liability concerns. Trees in the
area had a history of being impacted by gales, and there was a risk
of damage or injury.
- That, on balance he felt that removing the TPO
restrictions and replacing the tree with a native tree would be
more suitable.
- That, this would restore the amenity value, increase
biodiversity, and remove the stress of having an
inappropriate-sized tree in a suburban garden.
- That this approach would significantly increase the
biodiversity of several suburban gardens and serve as a suitable
approach in this case.
The
committee proceeded to ask questions and debate the
application.
RESOLVED
The committee agreed to refuse permission for the
reasons set out in the report.