Imogen Dawson addressed the
committee regarding the agenda item “Strategic Outline Case
for Station Approach and a summary of the matters she raised were
as follows.
- She
welcomed the emphasis on regarding carbon net zero, biodiversity
net gain, and sustainable development and the focus on
environmental, social, and economic benefits.
- She was
encouraged by the environmentally friendly urban mobility and
sustainable transport aspects.
- She
welcomed the desire to deliver a high-quality development with a
strong sense of place.
- She was
concerned over a lack of emphasis on important matters in the
proposals for Gladstone Street and Cattle Market sites and at the
possibility of student housing instead of housing for long-term
residents.
- That there
was concern about noise disturbance from heavy goods vehicles and
congestion.
- She noted
that there was a desire for a mix of housing options, including
shared ownership.
- She
referred to the findings from the City Science report on parking
usage and forecasting.
- That there
was a need to address traffic and congestion problems, especially
at the Carfax Junction.
- There were
concerns about a multi-story car park exacerbating traffic
issues.
- She wanted
to highlight the caveats about risks, unpredictability, and
financial crisis and was concerned over the challenges in getting a
viable scheme in line with the development brief.
- She
believed there to be difficulty in resolving movement-related
issues with Hampshire County Council and bus operators.
-
She recommended the council to suspend work and
expenditure on the Station Approach development at the current
time.
Councillor Tod, Leader and
Cabinet Member for Asset Management and Emma Taylor responded to a
number of these points within the introduction to the agenda
item.
Councillor Malcolm Wallace
addressed the committee regarding the agenda item “Q4
Performance Monitoring” and raised the following
matters:
- Regarding
Local Suppliers - The Council's spend with local suppliers (KPI
VLE13) was declining. What actions was the Council taking to
reverse this trend?
- Concerning
Winchester City Council Carbon Emissions (TCE01) - In 2021/22, the
Council's carbon emissions decreased by only 3% compared to 2019/20
(excluding COVID impact in 2020/21). What was the breakdown of
these emissions, and was the Council still on track to achieve zero
emissions by 2024?
- Concerning
Winchester City Council Carbon Emissions - The target for Council
carbon emissions in 2022/23 has increased more than threefold to
3,750 tCO2e (previously 1,075 tCO2e). How were these targets
set?
- Regarding
Traffic Movements - Why does the vehicle movements metric (TCE07)
focus only on Winchester City? Additionally, it was forecasted that
the M3J9 works would increase traffic in the district instead of
reducing it.
- Regarding
Carbon Neutrality
·
When was the Health & Environment
Policy Committee planning to discuss the new initiative for a
utility scale renewable energy project?
·
Could Members receive a briefing on the
HCC carbon assessment tool that would be used in future council
processes and reports (p273)?
·
The Carbon Footprint Report for 2022/23
was scheduled to be delivered to the Carbon Neutrality Board in
July 2023 (p273). How could Councillors access this
report?
-
Regarding the Winchester Movement Strategy - Could
officers clarify the statement made in the project update summary
about the reallocation of funding for walking and cycling measures
from Active Travel England (DfT) to other areas? Does this mean the
mini-Holland bid would not be funded?
Dawn Adey, Strategic Director
thanked Councillor Wallace for his questions and proposed that
officers convene a meeting with Councillor Wallace, the relevant
Cabinet Member(s), and officers.