Councillor Chris Westwood,
Cabinet Member for Housing introduced the report, ref EHP56 which
set out proposals for the Housing Repairs And Maintenance Policy,
(available
here). The introduction included
the following points.
- The report presented four proposed
policies for review and comment: Disabled Adaptations, Housing
Repairs and Maintenance, Housing Repairs Recharge, and Managing
Damp and Mold.
- Tenant input had been gathered
through a survey in May 2024 regarding the future operation of the
repairs service and to support the retendering of the repairs and
maintenance contract.
- Following an online consultation,
workshops were held with tenants and members and feedback was
incorporated into the updated policies.
- The policies would inform the
Council's future approach to delivering housing repairs and
maintenance, aiming for consistent application across all
areas.
- The Committee's comments were sought
on the four policies before a further tenant consultation.
- The draft policies, incorporating
the Committee's comments, would be presented to Cabinet Committee:
Housing in July 2025 for approval.
- Approval of the policies would
contribute to the modernisation of Housing Services by clearly
defining the scope of services covered and ensuring consistent and
easily understood application.
The committee was asked to
review and comment upon the proposed four
Policies attached,
namely:
1.
Disabled Adaptations Policy
2.
Housing Repairs And Maintenance Policy
3.
Housing Repairs Recharge Policy
4.
Managing Damp And Mould.
The committee proceeded to ask
questions and debate the report. In summary, the following matters
were raised.
Disabled Adaptations
Policy
- A question was asked regarding the
inclusion of disability due to injury or accident as part of the
policy.
- Clarification was sought regarding
the appeals process across all four policies and whether it
adequately addressed tenant dissatisfaction with decisions.
- It was asked how the council would
enforce the actions in the policies universally.
- Questions were raised concerning
budgets and the estimated need for adaptations, considering the
local ageing population.
- A question was asked regarding
timescales, specifically the 12-month timeframe for approved
adaptations and whether a more challenging target would be
useful.
- Clarification was sought regarding
item 5.4 on page 35, regarding properties adapted for disabilities
being let to able-bodied individuals and if they could then be
evicted if a disabled applicant needed the property.
- Following a previous point, it was
questioned how adaptations would be applied to properties occupied
by able-bodied individuals, given the potential need for larger
properties by families.
- A question was asked about including
a clawback on the policy regarding adaptations and the right to
buy.
- A question was asked about training
available for a broader group of officers to support the
implementation of the policy.
Housing Repairs and
Maintenance Policy
- A question was asked regarding
emergency repairs and recharges, specifically regarding what
constituted an emergency versus an urgent repair.
- Clarification was sought on page 50
regarding minor repairs that should be carried out by the tenant,
and whether there was a specific list in the tenancy
agreement.
- A question was raised about the
tenant's responsibility to reduce humidity levels and how this
aligned with damp and mould policies.
- Assurances were sought that the
out-of-hours process was sufficiently robust for the policy.
- A question was asked regarding
defects and whether a robust process would be to put in a review of
new homes at a set period.
- Concern was raised regarding the use
of the term "moderate colour" on page 57.
- A question was asked about the
accuracy of the wording regarding the five-year stock condition
survey within the planned works section.
- A question was asked regarding page
53 and a wider view of the tenant’s responsibilities that the
council would Recharge for.
Housing Repairs
Recharge Policy
- Regarding recharging for repairs and
damage when a tenancy ends, it was asked what happened when a
tenant died and if the council would try and recover money from an
estate.
- A comment was made regarding the
code of conduct for contractors, specifically regards advising
tenants of progress.
- It was asked if the council had had
success in implementing its previous policy in terms of
recharges.
- Further information was requested
regarding the scale of these charges.
- Regarding 5.9 on page 69, which
refers to tenants seeking consent to carry out works themselves and
a quality check potentially being carried out by council surveyors
and who would carry the cost for that survey.
Damp and Mould
Policy
- Given the high profile of Awaab's
Law and the stricter timescales relating to dealing with damp and
mould, a question was asked if this policy included those stricter
timescales.
- Regarding the causes of dampness,
particularly moisture released through drying clothes, a question
was asked whether the council might provide outdoor drying
facilities.
- For private tenants, how did we
empower them to complain about their landlord if no action on
previously raised issues had been taken?
- It was asked whether it would be
feasible for council contractors who were going into the properties
to undertake repairs, would be able to report back on any damp and
mould issues noticed.
- Regarding the performance measures
on page 89, a question was asked about the systems and mechanisms
being used to capture the data for the weekly report to be put on
the website.
- A general question was asked
regarding how recently the policies were last reviewed and whether
these review dates could be included in the documents.
These points were responded to
by Councillor Chris Westwood, Cabinet Member for Housing, Gilly
Knight, Corporate Head of Housing and Simon Hendey, Strategic
Director accordingly.
RESOLVED:
1.
That the committee thanked officers for bringing the new policies
together, noting that they provide clarity on the responsibilities
of both tenants and the council.
2.
The committee raised the importance of a robust appeals process,
particularly for the recharge policy, anticipating potential
challenges from tenants due to its new implementation.
3.
That the committee welcomed the regular review of the policies and
suggested stating the implementation date and review date on the
policy itself.
4.
That the committee requested a review of the policies at this
committee in one year, following implementation, to assess the
actual situation.
5.
That the cabinet member considers the committee’s comments
raised during the discussion of the item.